|
|
|
|
|
by FeepingCreature
1192 days ago
|
|
> - Whether the text generated by LLMs is factual or not is purely coincidental. No, because the probability of a word on the internet being factual is not coincidental. Factuality compresses the corpus; the truth is generally the simplest explanation for a set of observations. (The collected text of the internet is a set of observations about reality.) > IMO, the only emergent behavior that LLMs are showing is the output they generate looks like it might have been generated by a human The whole point of the Turing Test is to stop people from asking "yes, it acts indistinguishable from a human but is it human?" "Generating output that looks human" is in fact the entirety of AGI. |
|
- The corpus of written language is full of ambiguity and contradictory statements.
- A lie makes it's way half way around the world before the truth can even get its pants on.
- What's thought true today will not be thought true tomorrow. This happens sometimes in the direction of veracity. Sometimes, the other way around.
- Factuality and consensus are not the same.