[b3b0p]

Did you track caloric intake (accurately) on a daily basis? Do you have a base line estimate of how much you burn?

Eating as much as you want can be different things for different people. I know if you gave me a rib eye and eggs cooked in butter or eggs and bacon I could more than eat my fair share of calories burned for the day in that single sitting. No problem. I've done it, multiple times.

I found I got fatter on a too high fat diet. The amount of food, in quantity/volume, not calories, was less since fat has double the calories of carbs and proteins and I always could fit in more.

[nessus42]

No I didn't track caloric intake. Why would I do that? One of the selling points of these low carb diets is that I wouldn't have to track such things -- that all I would have to do is not eat many carbs and that I would lose weight.

I'm certainly not claiming that this style of diet would work for everyone, but it certainly seems to work for many people. One thing I noticed is that when I wasn't eating carbs, that eating a rib eye with eggs and butter and bacon didn't seem nearly as appealing in large quantities as it otherwise would have. The diet did take away a lot of the pleasure of eating, which may be in part why it worked. I just ended up not being terribly excited by foods without carbs in them and consequently perhaps didn't over-eat. I would have killed for a saltine, though.

Another thing I noticed is that I wouldn't lose weight if I ate lots of nuts. It seems likely that the reason for this fact is that nuts are just too high in fat to eat in large quantities and continue to lose weight. But the diet warned against eating many nuts.

In any case, I think the point is not that you can eat any amount of fat and protein and lose weight, but rather than you can eat as much as you will end up wanting. (With the exception of nuts.) And that you won't end up feeling hungry.