[kordite]

I frequently work with companies that have old, large codebases. A key requirement of the training in that environment is that attendees are able to read existing production code. In some cases that's over twenty years old and millions of lines of code. new/delete is just part of that reality. We teach them without encouraging their use.

[jb1991]

That's perfectly reasonable. I have fortunately worked on greenfield projects, so don't have to contend with legacy paradigms.

[salawat]

Ah, so you've been doing programming-lite.

You haven't programmed til you've come to the realization that billions of dollars worth of man hours are about to go down the toilet because of an assumption made 20 years ago, in a 4th order dependency, that you can't get rid of, and to rewrite is going to cost another couple million dollars, and spent a night with a bottle of whiskey wondering whether it's really all worth it.

Where my maintainers/InfoSec bros at?

[jb1991]

> Ah, so you've been doing programming-lite.

I hope you can understand why that's offensive.

[kordite]

Absolutely. I would also not use new/delete in that situation. It would depend on the audience whether they were still taught on a course, sometimes there is, and sometimes there isn't an educational purpose.