|
|
|
|
|
|
by randm_sequence
1187 days ago
|
|
|
This is an incorrect interpretation of this paper. It is comparing COVID positive to assumed COVID non-positive. Also, the methodology is deeply flawed as they took the first 1000 folks to respond. This is an incredibly biased approach, akin to believing that individuals who submit reviews online are from a normal distribution. |
|
|