[dilippkumar]

According to one bitcoin maximalist[0] this was the real origin of fiat currency.

I’m not sure I understand everything that is said nor fully believe, given that it’s a bitcoin maximalist dumping on fiat currency, but what I took away was that the english pound was redeemable for gold. When they did this fake bond purchase, they just minted new pounds (that didn’t have gold backing it) and used that to buy back these bonds in secret.

This is significant because there was a fear of a bank run in England at the start of the war where everyone was afraid that this would happen. The Bank of England had to assure everyone that they wouldn’t do this to stop the bank run - and so, when they actually went ahead and did it, they kind of had to keep it secret

[0]. https://youtu.be/gp4U5aH_T6A

[nl]

> When they did this fake bond purchase, they just minted new pounds

I didn't watch the video but if this is what they said it's wrong. The Bank of England had the money in their reserves and they used that.

[dragonwriter]

As best historians can determine, fiat currency originated in 11th Century China; with absolute confidence we can say it didn’t originate in 20th Century Britain.

[thaumasiotes]

> As best historians can determine, fiat currency originated in 11th Century China

This is untrue; for example, fiat currency was already in use in Seleucid Persia (which began in the 4th century BC).

It wouldn't be even minorly difficult to turn up other examples; any time there's a fixed exchange rate between coins of different metals, one of those coins is fiat.

[hgomersall]

Which is wrong - the Romans realised that money should carry the face value of the coin over its commodity value, enforced by the power of the state (and taxation). It was kind of forgotten in the middle ages, when coin was a weird hybrid of its face value and its commodity value (much of the monetary shenanigans for hundreds of years was concerned with maintaining face value in light of fluctuating commodity prices).