| > But neither do you. Unlike you, I never claimed it. > All of the things you've said that I've called out as lies, are lies, blatant untruths, and/or have been thoroughly debunked. As usual, there is no proof of "debunking". > No, those are the oil executives, as well as hypocrites who love to pretend to be doing good while only being in it for attention Normally I should have stopped long ago as I normally don't entertain religious fanatics. "Climate change" scam advocates are perfectly fitting your description of hypocrites as to best of my knowledge none of them follows their preachings. It's all entertainment for dumb crowd. > You're only paying attention to the rich and famous, and not to the real people on the ground. I am talking about "climate change" preachers. They don't follow what they preach. Certainly some people do follow those preachings, but I have nothing more than pity for them. > I'm sure you've cherry-picked your own selection of outrageous claims to prove your point, but if you actually did your research honestly, you'd see it's not zero. Many predictions have come true. I like how you are trying to project your ways of discussion on me :) Says a lot. Just a reminder - I didn't "cherry pick" anything for anyone who can read and encouraged doing their own research. Sapienti sat. > A small selection: Your selection is "water is wet". It's not a selection. > Weather is getting less stable. Some areas get unprecedented floods, others extreme draughts And this one is outright lie. There is no data supporting it. Droughts, floods happened there over course of history. Just because ww have internet now and can read about it and see photos on Instagram doesn't make it any "less stable". Although I think you know it and just trying to deceive to push your narrative. > The climate is destabilising I would ask what this nonsensical sentence means but sorry I have no time to prolong this discussion. Wishing you all the best |