Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Alupis 1194 days ago
The point is not whether or not I personally would be hurt by this, or rather the metaphoric I, for the matter.

The point is the rules where changed mid-game to protect a bunch of very well connected people that played extremely loose with the "rules" and will suffer zero consequences as a result - because my personal dollars are being used to protect them.

Regarding the $250k cap in general - in my opinion, it's far too low. It's lower than the average price of a house in a large amount of the country.

1 comments

To be clear, who are the people that "played extremely loose" in your ire? The bank management or the individual bank account holders that had more than $250k in the accounts?

What does the price of a house have to do with the cash-on-hand bank accounts of the average citizen?