|
|
|
|
|
by Firmwarrior
1193 days ago
|
|
That fits my experience. If your W-2 income is 200k+ you should be able to afford everything including a place to live (old beaten-down shithole house in a bad neighborhood with a long commute, or old beaten-down tiny shithole condo close to work) Of course, it's easy to look at that and say "Oh, I'm coming out way ahead by making 150k in $NormalCity instead", but realistically _everything_ after that base 200k is going straight into liquid net worth. So if you're choosing between 400k in Mountain View and 300k in $NormalCity it's an interesting decision, but 400k in Mountain View means you're going to retire way earlier than you would with 200k in $NormalCity |
|
People say "oh my god, housing is double in the Bay Area"? And yeah it is. But if you're renting and it doubles from $2,000 to $4,000, that's an extra $24,000 post-tax per year.
If you're getting a salary bump of >$36,000 per year (pre-tax) then you'll still be ahead paying double for rent.