[angrais]

It is illegal for you to download copyrighted material and distribute it as your own. Models trained on such data can (and are statistically more likely) to produce similar output as their (training) input.

So training must consider licencing where copyright material is used and not consume all data.

Your brain is not a model. You can not reproduce most of what you see. You're not "training" your brain by glancing at an image as your recall concerning that image will be terrible.

[meh8881]

My brain can certainly recreate something it’s seen before. And it can certainly create something similar to a thing it’s seen before. It’s legal to do the latter and illegal to do the latter. Imperfections on the exact recreations don’t affect the legality of it.

Am I violating copyright law because I am merely capable of producing a copy of something? Obviously not. Why should the model be?

[antibasilisk]

>It is illegal for you to download copyrighted material and distribute it as your own

I'm sure the millions of people who violate copyright law daily with absolutely no repercussions care very much about that.

[ClumsyPilot]

Millions of people dont pay taxes and cross the road in the wrong place.

You cant setup a cinema and charge ticket for the movies you stole.

Its the money making side that matters - not individuals ij a private house

[antibasilisk]

Ok, so then lets violate copyright and open source the effort!

[Paradigma11]

There will just be checks that make sure that the generated content is not similar enough to violate copyrights of training material and that's it.