Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nsxwolf 1197 days ago
Passing the LSAT is a fairly good indicator that a human can be a lawyer. It's not yet a good indicator that a large language model can be a lawyer.
2 comments

This is an underrated comment. Compare: playing top level chess is a good indicator that someone will be good at maths problems, but not that a chess computer will be.
So what is missing? Could we add up those missing competencies to create a new test of "general knowledge-worker capabilities" and then train an AI to pass this test?