|
|
|
|
|
by chernevik
1199 days ago
|
|
Not a lawyer but this always struck me as exaggerated. One, the FDIC was always going to provide a meaningful fraction in days which would have covered payroll. Employees and vendors are going to understand a few days delay because of a bank failure. It's embarrassing and bad but not existential. Two, I expect the law is written such that a payment failure for liquidity induced bankruptcy isn't going to reach directors/officers. It's California so who knows but a law that did would be very badly written. |
|
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio....
Or for some analysis
https://www.fennemorelaw.com/california-court-clarifies-pers...