[pas]

Thanks for responding!

I'm familiar with the idioms (and there's the picture of people literally standing in front of the HQ), and them being common, I just don't think they are good choices here. Just as I don't think referring to the regulator without naming it is a good practice. It's just too vague.

> But I objectively I don't think your criticisms land.

Fair, matters of style preferences are subjective anyway :)

The reading experience of your comment was much more coherent to me than the article's.

I know it's a strange claim, especially after spending half a page discussing somewhat unfruitfully what's "my beef" with the article.