[kortilla]

> I won't talk about this until you watch this: https://www.dominionmovement.com/watch (warning: very graphic content).

False equivalences abound. Do you argue against people legally consuming marijuana because the cartels skin people alive?

> And they don't matter less than you do.

Do you think life in prison or even the death penalty should be on the table for a drunk driver that hits and kills a pregnant skunk? Because that’s what would happen if it was a pregnant woman instead.

[drewm1980]

> Do you argue against people legally consuming marijuana because the cartels skin people alive?

Skinning people alive is not vegan. Humans are animals too.

> Do you think life in prison or even the death penalty should be on the table for a drunk driver that hits and kills a pregnant skunk? Because that’s what would happen if it was a pregnant woman instead.

Driving over a sentient being with your car is not vegan, skunk or woman, pregnant or not.

I'm not being sarcastic. Vegans are so often accused of not caring about humans that some people actually believe the FUD, and you might be one of them.

[kortilla]

> Skinning people alive is not vegan. Humans are animals too.

I didn’t say it was. But you support it if you smoke marijuana by the logic being proposed.

> Driving over a sentient being with your car is not vegan, skunk or woman, pregnant or not.

I didn’t say it was. But the equivalence of animal and human life leads to the conclusion that life in prison (or the death penalty) would be appropriate for the “murder” of the skunk.