[jitl]

Your website feels like an infomercial. As an engineer, I went looking for some explanation of your language and how its grammar and semantics differ from SQL, but mostly I found a large jumble of JSON output and “demos”.

The website is a about value proposition but if I have to dig into demo code internals to understand the product being offered, you’re asking a lot from me.

Curious also why your co-founder is strictly off-limits and you’re building demos that he’s “not responsible for”. That gives a weird vibe too.

I’m an enthusiast for SQL-like, join-free DB access and have a large appetite for weird/new ideas in this space, but after spending 10 min on the website on my phone, I gave up on satisfying my curiosity.

[dfragnito]

The focus is on value prop. and yes the docs are lacking.

Your feedback to include a comparison of our language to SQL is good. I was hoping the breakdown of the "shop admin" demo detailed the semantics of the language but looks like that it did not work for you.

The thought was that by going through the examples with the free trial one could get up top speed with SFSQL, but maybe a more formal introduction to the language is needed.

For reasons beyond our control Eric is not available for commenting at this time. He not wanting to take credit for the demos was more of a joke. Non trivial client work we have produced with SFSQL is not available for public review. I wanted public demos so I made them also to show how a novice can hook up a back-end with SFSQL sorry it came off as weird.

Also sorry we could not peak your curiosity a bit more, we will do better.

[jitl]

Compare your approach to EdgeDB - https://www.edgedb.com/. They have a similar product - SQL alternative but not NoSQL. Their homepage is also a little long, but has clear examples.

[dfragnito]

Yes I see what you mean by "infomercial" when comparing SFSQL to EdgeDb. Was not our intention, its a work in progress. Will make the needed changes, thanks again for feedback.