|
|
|
|
|
by MacsHeadroom
1201 days ago
|
|
The idea that models can't be copyrighted isn't far fetched. The basic idea is that models are created by an automated process not by a person. The courts have already upheld that AI generated output is not copyrightable for this exact reason. So if you do not buy that it applies to models then you would have to explain the difference between the process which outputs bits into a model's layers (aka training) and the process which takes bits into the input layer and then dumps out the subsequent bits of the output layer (inference /generation). Then explain why that distinction is different in regards to the applicability of copyright. |
|
In the model's case, though, it's even easier why it could be copyrightable, as a "baked" model is still created by people fine-tuning it, setting parameters and hardcoded stuff, training it with this or that set and excluding other, and so on.
For example music composed and rendered as audio by generative algorithms (something which doesn't even need AI, just some rules and stohastic processes) has been created and copyrighted just fine for decades...