|
|
|
|
|
|
by kragen
1199 days ago
|
|
|
i thought it was an unnecessarily ambiguous way to phrase it; 'fully protects all depositors' and 'will have access to all of their money' doesn't explicitly say that they won't take a haircut; after all, after a haircut, you still have access to all of your money, it's just that 'all of your money' is less than it was before it relies on the following paragraph to be explicit that all depositors will be made whole and will not lose any money |
|
|
> will have access to all of their money
Maybe the should have added
> will not lose any money
Third time’s a charm!