Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nodemaker 1190 days ago
There is not much difference if you look at it from the point of view that one of those parties was just underestimating the risk they were taking (which is true of all bad decisions in life). I see no reason to bail out depositors over 250k
1 comments

When you capitalize a bank with deposits, are you really an “investor” with expected risk/reward?

I am not for totally punishing someone who expects a near-zero return on a loan, especially when they made the loan with the expectation the borrower would help other businesses be productive.

We should not take for granted that value can be transferred through time for free and without any risks. When you give another party control of your money (including a bank) they make decisions on your behalf for which there are consequences.