|
|
|
|
|
by adolph
1202 days ago
|
|
> Fine, save SVB, funded by a 1-off 100% wealth tax on anyone worth over $10m in silicon valley. The interesting part to this is that if wealth (assets) were taxed thusly, they would probably lose a lot of value when liquidated to pay taxes, thus decreasing the realized taxable amount. As I understand it, a similar principle was behind SVB’s “losses” as well. |
|