|
|
|
|
|
by igouy
1202 days ago
|
|
afaik Smalltalk implementations usually provide step backwards but don't "run backwards". "The stack of (framed) execution contexts gives a history of the computation so far. You can select any frame, view instance values in the receiver, view the arguments and method variables at that point." So step backwards, modify a method, step backwards before that method send, and resume execution with the modified method. (Note: resume rather than restart, so the modified method has the preserved context unless we manually edit that context.) |
|