|
|
|
|
|
by silasdavis
1198 days ago
|
|
It is also kind of an abstraction over cash and treasury bonds. A more liquid fractionalised cash/bond unit. Though that seems to have been the problem here. The original idea with a 100% collaterilised peg was that the entire reserve would be cash. Somewhere along the way treasury bonds were considered cash equivalent. Which on the face of it seems sort of reasonable but clearly they do have a different risk and liquidity profile. This allows the centre consortium to earn a yield. So I'm not sure I think a USDC is a dollar, but also I'm not sure it's particularly different to what banks do with deposits to earn a yield. One difference is you can reinvest the same USDC to earn a yield while the underlying backing USD also earns centre a yield. |
|