|
|
|
|
|
by shrimp_emoji
1203 days ago
|
|
To make the "junk DNA" argument for the laryngeal nerve is stretching credulity so much that you're clearly practicing motivated reasoning to argue backwards from a conclusion. (I have to assume you must not know what the laryngeal nerve point is even about. Google "laryngeal nerve giraffe". Also try "blind spot why do octopus eyes not have it".) Apply this type of thinking to anything else, and you'll never arrive at accurate or useful outcomes. You're just deluding yourself. |
|