[SamoyedFurFluff]

My understanding is that if the fines ever become an existential threat then it motivates companies to commit criminal behavior but try to be sneakier about it, because in for a penny in for a pound.

Of course we’re finding out repeatedly that no threatening fines don’t prevent that behavior either. :/ there’s a theoretical fine line where just enough fines will prevent such behavior but frankly I’m having a harder and harder time believing such rhetoric.

Maybe it’s the ownership of such companies that are wrong. I highly doubt Cerebral would’ve made this decision in the first place if it was owned by regular people, especially regular mental health professionals.