|
|
|
|
|
by kuczmama
1196 days ago
|
|
That's a very good point. I think services could include things like financial management, checking, sending/receiving fees, etc. You're right, in this model it wouldn't be nearly as profitable to be a bank as it is now. Potentially, it could be a "public good" provided by the government, or it could be like a lot of the brokerages who provide investment services and charge a commission on top. Also, you're right it would be very hard for banks to be anywhere near as profitable as they are now if assets are backed 1:1. But in some sense, banking is already viewed as a public good since the FDIC is backing all of the bank deposits. So at the moment we kind of have a weird hybrid situation where banks are kind of pseudo-private, but also backed by the government. |
|
Then you could have banks handle the process of matching lenders to depositors. With varying systems...