|
|
|
|
|
by chclt
1196 days ago
|
|
As a sibling comment to mine points out, people who "die or have their life destroyed" is simply one way to define victim in this context. With mental health data being at stake here, the amount of victims under this definition could also very well be non-zero. Anyway there are a lot of crimes, that don't produce those kind of victims. If I mug someone and don't kill them or destroy their life in the process, have I not commited a crime? The privacy infringement here is an obvious damage to the dignity of everyone affected.
Wouldn't you feel victimized if I listened in on you speaking with your doctor, wrote everything down, stamped your name, address, and date of birth on it and started giving out copies of the resulting paper to random people? Which is exactly whats happening here, except my example is more harmless by a factor of a few million people and has a lot fewer data points. |
|
I would. I would also feel victimized if you mugged me (without killing me or hurting me physically). The question we are debating here is - should you be punished equally harshly in this two scenarios? I'm leaning towards "no". If you disagree I would like to understand your reasoning.