[rwalle]

"switch my hosting provider at any time"

Sorry, obviously you are not the kind of customer that the three big players care about.

Also, I hope you could show real data points for the comment regarding Hetzner instead of just putting a very questionable claim here.

[mkup]

I don't understand you. I have said that Hetzner is not going to suspend my account (or deprive me of customer support) on the grounds of paying too little per month. What kind of data point you need? I am the data point. I'm their customer since 2015.

The general point I was trying to make is not an advertisement of particular hosting provider, but the fact that traditional hosting providers are totally fungible. If tomorrow this company goes bonkers and starts doing stupid things, then I just migrate to OVH, DigitalOcean, Vultr or any other competitor on this market. But unlike traditional hosting providers, there is no market among big cloud providers, as they are not fungible on the customer API level, so each of them is actually a monopoly. And monopoly is generally no good for customers. The rest can be deduced from this principle.

[tracker1]

I wouldn't say that... there are a LOT of sites that operate at under $1k/month spend. If you lose 10k customers for one big fish, is it worth it? I know it's not apples to apples, but still can really matter. And just maybe it's not worth supporting a bigger player in that case altogether.

And for the bigger fish, if it's me, I'm one to push for complete containerization and orchestration beyond simple DBAS service for PostgreSQL, depending on needs for scale. Which absolutely means switching can be easy enough.

The only advantage the big cloud providers have is the services for the lower-middle tier customers.