[robertlagrant]

> the decision is not a dichotomy between complete surveillance of all communication and doing nothing at all

The problem is that from a security perspective, it sort of is all or nothing.

[danbruc]

You misunderstood me, I did not want to say that you can have some partial end-to-end encryption, I meant that not outlawing end-to-end encryption does not mean that you do or can do nothing against illegal content, i.e. there are other ways to fight this problem besides outlawing end-to-end encryption.

[robertlagrant]

Oh! Hah. The exact opposite of what I thought you meant, then :)