Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by yosser 1195 days ago
Isn't this a red herrring? I thought the law didn't require the removal of E2E encryption, but rather mandated the addition of a back door that submits some kind of meta data summary to a third party service?
3 comments

Is that better? The effect is the same.
I think they meant to say that this is just a PR stunt by saying they won't remove encryption (because they don't even need to to comply)
That depends entirely upon who gets to define "End-to-end", and whether they are held to task for any inaccuracies in that definition
is it truly E2E encryption if it has a backdoor?
whatsapp has that.