The simple fact that a LLM is trained on a gigantic corpus of data and humans learn from a relatively tiny number of interactions with other humans shows that they obviously learn differently.
If we took all of the data that a human takes in from all of their senses, I'm not sure if humans use less data.
Humans take in 10 million bits[1] from their eyes every second. 10,000,000 bits/sec * 60 secs/min * 60 mins/hour * 24 hours/day * 1000 days = 108 terabytes. ChatGPT only used 570 GB of training data, so 2 orders of magnitude less data, and that's only counting the visual data.
edit: And that would be for a 3 year old, so comparing ChatGPT's intelligence to a 3 year old shows that ChatGPT comes out favourably.
but those interactions are infinitely complex and contain an enormous amount of data