[soco]

Your concerns are valid indeed, and on top of them one must also think about what's the alternative. Because if you leave service A you'll necessarily use service B - I assume nobody leaves Kagi to give up searching. So the choice is between a possible bad outcome (Kagi) versus a known bad outcome (Google).

[threatofrain]

The difference in privacy I see between Kagi and Google is that Kagi requires me to have a signed-in account to search, and Kagi accurately associates more valuable information with a signed-in account.

[Aeolun]

I don’t think you can have both ad-free (e.g. paid) search and anonymous search at the same time.

You have to pick one. And you can’t really fault Kagi for providing the one when the other is already “adequately” covered by Google.

[monort]

Surely you can. You can use blind signatures, it's like issuing anonymous tokens in the style of David Chaum digital cash. Or you can just use existing cryptocurrency.

Supposedly they are not doing it because of advantages of associating your payment method and searches.

[rofrol]

cryptocurrency?

[ashwagary]

Interesting point.

Maybe Kagi could offer a more privacy friendly "fill a wallet with crypto and we'll deduct a certain amount per search" option that doesnt require user billing data.

Im not a current user but would be more likely to test it if available.

[soco]

I don't know how Kagi internally operates but for billing purposes I imagine it would be enough to record that you searched. Not what you searched.