Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tedunangst 5264 days ago
Then explain that to the judge. The defendant in this case is not claiming to be the victim of mistaken identity.
1 comments

that was even less to the point. you are good

ignore the mistaken identity, was just a means to reach the false/wrong accusation resulting in the experiment he just did convicting him.

I don't see the problem. People get convicted based on faulty evidence. The sad fact is it happens. [Yes, that is a problem, but...] Why is cryptography special?
read the comment that started this thread.

the guy has a file that is pure garbage. not encrypted.

the law officers THINK it's encrypted. the judge orders him to give the key. ...there's no key. it's honestly garbage data.

That's what make encryption special. It were a safe, the police could crack it open somehow. with encryption, they can just claim it's too advanced to be cracked and that will be treated like you are lying.