[trevoristall]

You're arguing in bad faith, the point is that limiting access to speech platforms is not in the interest of citizens and only serves the government.

[red-iron-pine]

That's not bad faith. Your argument is bollocks -- free speech in action. And it was not impacted by using or not using TikTok.

Were TikTok to be banned, that comment would still exist.

Likewise, I'll post a video about it... to youtube, to vimeo, to wherever.

[Jarwain]

This made me wonder, is a conference's choice of which speakers to schedule an act of free speech by the conference organizers?

Is regulation of access to a public square a violation of free speech? What about shutdown of a given public square, knowing there are other squares?

[stcroixx]

They have enough tanks to squash as many people they'd like in as many town squares as they have, just like everyone saw them do in Tiananmen square.