Bitcoin has a use, but there are other options for consensus algorithms that don't waste as much energy as the citizens of a medium sized country and fill the same user case (and other expanded use cases). Why not just do that?
Strictly speaking, the comment you're replying to doesn't say which of the two is a contest to waste resources and which has potential to have useful results.
In general, the purpose of Bitcoin is not to get rich, but to have a currency that is universally accepted and not tied to a political party’s fiscal decisions.
Only if you really like big numbers for the sake of them. Otherwise, one is just straight up snake oil[0], and the other… is kinda hard to tell yet, because while I'm really impressed, I don't know if it's {a toy, a tool, the first sign of a major transformation}.
[0] did you know the original snake oils contains more omega-3 and therefore improves cognitive function when compared to lard? I did not. But you can get omega-3 elsewhere, and the people who made the term synonymous with fraud didn't use those snakes, so…