[stale2002]

> No, this seems misguided. Section 230 protects the small Mastodon instance I'm on in the same way it protects Twitter.

If you are willing to be even slightly clever you will figure out that this is an easily solvable problem.

Just do what the EU did, or Texas did, and remove/modify section 230 protections only for very large social media companies, defined as have literally 10s of millions of users.

That way, the small platforms are protected, and the large ones that are the problem actors, have to change.

Problem solved.

No need to worry about this straw man position of "look how bad things would be if we do the dumb thing and didn't implement the easy to figure solution that solves most of the complaints!".