[kennend3]

Instead of asking sensationalist questions designed to create fear...why not look into it?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S173857331...

The studies have already been done, crashing a jet into a nuclear power plant wont do much.

I'm more familiar with Canada's designs and the walls are several M thick of reinforced concrete. Not exactly material known for being easy to break into.

This is from the power plant close by me :

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.8122465,-79.0744714,3a,48.2y,...

warning that you may be shot for entering has a tendency of keeping people away

[alexfromapex]

You may not be familiar with Socratic questioning. Your response also comes off as rude. The question was meant as a prompt for dialogue not because I didn’t already research this topic.

[kennend3]

your post looks like it has been downvoted, so i guess no one was familiar with "Socratic questioning" and your post comes across as "anti-nuclear" without doing any research.

as a leanring oppertunity, this is what Socratic questioning looks like:

What is an example of Socratic questioning?

What do you mean when you say X? Could you explain that point further? Can you provide an example? Is there a different point of view?

you simply asked negative-framed questions : Why did the regulators approve fission reactors knowing our country has enemies..

[alexfromapex]

Thanks for the “leanring oppertunity” … yeesh. I feel so much smarter now. Making vague generalizations like “no one is familiar” because one person saw my comment and downvoted is a fallacy my friend.