At this point, it seems near impossible that anyone who isn’t a shill for corporations can be appointed to a position intended to be a check on said corporate interests.
I’m not sure how anyone who wants to see legitimate progress in technology would not support this candidate. Sure if you’re a m/billionaire it’s a bad pick but for the general populace, this was a solid pick. And it’s quite obvious that said corporate interests bought their way out of this candidate.
Being nakedly aggressive towards the people with whom you are supposed to work isn't going to help get anything done. If the hearing proved anything it was that she was hyper partisan.
I’m not sure how anyone who wants to see legitimate progress in technology would not support this candidate. Sure if you’re a m/billionaire it’s a bad pick but for the general populace, this was a solid pick. And it’s quite obvious that said corporate interests bought their way out of this candidate.