|
|
|
|
|
|
by yrdmb
1202 days ago
|
|
|
> There is no value to this comment. There is always value in truthful statements. You are right that 91 is not the smallest number as was implied by the parent. -91 is. After all it was the parent who brought in the negative integers into the mix. |
|
|
As long as we're not talking about nonzero value.
I think GP made a worthwhile point, but in general the universe is full of uninteresting truths. Like take two large, distinct numbers, assert that they are unequal. Is that specific truth valuable?