|
|
|
|
|
|
by lll-o-lll
1203 days ago
|
|
|
It’s not that simple. Rust is used in the system’s programming space and as a result it will be used in many places where unsafe ends up required to solve problems. There won’t be memory safety bugs in safe Rust, but there will be in the interop/unsafe layers. I think there is a strong argument to be made that if you need a lot of unsafe, Zig is going to be the safer language. |
|
|
I could see that. Haven't used zig but it does look very nice.
> in many places where unsafe ends up required
Yes, I definitely agree. I was specifically referring to the boundary of safe rust. I don't know how much more or less safe unsafe rust is vs c, but I do know that safe rust is certainly safer than c.