|
|
|
|
|
by woodruffw
1204 days ago
|
|
Yes: the implication was that the original object was `const`. If you both add and remove const, that's well-defined. (I've yet to see a C or C++ codebase where object provenance actually guarantees this; I've see a lot of C and C++ codebases with const-stripping induced UB.) |
|