> I'll switch when IPv4 stops working. Until then, I have no reason to switch.
IPv4 has stopped working for a lot of people already, especially if they're not with a fancy-pants ISP with lots of legacy IPv4 addresses already 'in the bank'. From another discussion:
> I've actually run into this [CG NAT] helping a friend host a game server on their residential internet in a more rural part of Texas. They had to call their ISP and request a static IP address at an extra cost of something like $5/mo.
IPv4 has stopped working for a lot of people already, especially if they're not with a fancy-pants ISP with lots of legacy IPv4 addresses already 'in the bank'. From another discussion:
> I've actually run into this [CG NAT] helping a friend host a game server on their residential internet in a more rural part of Texas. They had to call their ISP and request a static IP address at an extra cost of something like $5/mo.
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35046929
IPv4 is also not working for the Indian reservation mentioned in the article: they had to spend >$200K to support these Roku devices.