|
|
|
|
|
by psychphysic
1201 days ago
|
|
That's at least a tertiary factor in "freeing" women. 1. The creation of domestic appliances that dramatically shorten house hold chores (washing clothing is a main one). 2. The move from the bulk of work labour being less physical. Both meant there was less time needed to maintain a household, previously that was a full time job that seemed unpaid. And that women had suitable roles available in the work force where as manual labour would mean they likely couldn't compete with men for employment. While society gained extra productivity from these changes, it's debatable if households gained financially as it was likely a powerful force in the mid century inflation. I'd place centralised schooling in that list of things which freed up more labour. Contraceptives are recognised for this too, and I'm sure it lead to a sexual liberation at least. |
|
Honestly, given where the productivity gains of women in the workforce went (not to the actual workers), we'd probably have a better quality of life if only half the household adults worked.