|
|
|
|
|
by userbinator
1204 days ago
|
|
If you want really long battery life and no heat at all, you can downclock all the way to something like 200-400MHz. A recent CPU at that speed is actually quite usable for things like text editing and reading documentation. Laptops shouldn't be using boost anyways, because their form factors and CPU coolers just can't handle the heat output. On the other hand, if it's plugged in much of the time, then let it boost as much as it can, with speed only thermally limited. Otherwise you're not getting the true performance you paid for. |
|
Linux does grant the user that flexibility, so if someone actually wants that, they can have it.
The max non-boost frequency is usually the sweet spot for performance and efficiency.
> On the other hand, if it's plugged in much of the time, then let it boost as much as it can, with speed only thermally limited. Otherwise you're not getting the true performance you paid for.
If the user wants to live with a potentially reduced laptop lifespan, sure thing. But it's just not worth it for a laptop, frankly, given their limited thermal cooling capacities. That CPU will degrade over time when run at that level of heat.