[clnq]

It's unfortunate that the morality filters dull and bias the debate so much. With certain controversial topics, the debaters end up fundamentally agreeing. It makes this application of GPT rather impotent compared to what it could be; and it's a good case study for why morality bias harms AI.

It's always interesting to hear debaters defend popularly rejected or unconventional positions. Otherwise the debate as an instrument of philosophy would be very blunt.