Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by surfingninja 1206 days ago
Take the timestamp "1677951565000123456" for example - If I put it into the link you posted, it just gives me "Saturday, March 4, 2023 11:39:25 AM". While it's a minor drawback, it requires another step to figure out the microsecond and nansecond part of the timestamp since it's not in the output. My website would display "Saturday March 3 2023 11:39:25.000,123,456 AM -06:00 (nanos)", which gives you "000,123,456" telling you the milli,micro,nano breakdown of the timestamp
1 comments

> Take the timestamp "1677951565000123456" for example - If I put it into the link you posted, it just gives me "Saturday, March 4, 2023 11:39:25 AM"

It looks like it only gives millisecond resolution in the output, and only displays milliseconds if there is at least 1 millisecond. Give it 1677951565020123456 and then you will get 11:39:25.020.