|
|
|
|
|
by jiggy2011
5265 days ago
|
|
Apache is licensed under the apache license , not GPL. This is an important distinction as I don't believe they could do what they do under GPL which is provide proprietary stuff on top of the open source core. Sourcefire is selling the faster access to releases of rulesets etc, the GPL software is simply the carrot. RHEL contains software that is not GPL and I doubt that they would stay in business without selling support. The GPL license was designed specifically to stop people developing proprietary software on top of GPL software. |
|
As for the other two, you're still picking nits. The companies wouldn't exist without the software, and they sell it. There's still no good reason for WHY you would discount them as being irrelevent just because they're also selling other services.