[nunobrito]

I remain to be convinced and program daily in Java for a long time.

It seems just as difficult to remember/useless as lambda expressions that look fine as vanity one-line expressions and then get difficult to write for most programmers.

We don't really need vanity innovation in the Java world. I would have asked for priority on the FX replacement to Swing, or support for running on ESP32 IoT devices as replacement to the Arduino platform.

Instead we get some weird looking syntax for what is basically a non-problem.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[imtringued]

JavaScript basically has the same functionality but with ${}. Anyone who uses named parameters in HQL or SQL queries would be very grateful for this feature as it means you no longer have to type out the same name three times for each parameter.

[nunobrito]

Still don't get the need for it.

You could always use the + operator to join strings. Even a external library would do just fine when you want to insert some kind of variable name inside strings for that purpose.

Don't really get the need for this to be a core function with such a java-unlike grammar.

[kaba0]

> We don't really need vanity innovation in the Java world. I would have asked for priority on the FX replacement to Swing, or support for running on ESP32 IoT devices as replacement to the Arduino platform.

Which are entirely unrelated projects to this one with very different engineers working on it. Those are easily parallelized, if you will. I don’t see why having progress completely elsewhere by different people is detrimental to these goals at all.

[nunobrito]

Because this thing here adds complexity to the language.

I'll be fine and ignore it completely like I've done with lambdas. I just pity the fools who enter Java world to learn the language and will suffer trying to learn what they believe is something normal programmers use.

Poor souls.