[piqi]

> What is your point?

I could ask the same of your original comment. Seems you like hand-waving at grants, and letting the reader come to a conclusion as a way of suggesting there's something nefarious happening. You don't like it when it's used elsewhere.

Typical divisive comment to stir the pot. It could even suggest you are being paid by an enemy of the US to disrupt or discourage/encourage discussion on particular topics. Of course, I'll use your tactic, and not provide any further information on this. I'll leave it up to the reader to wonder.

> blatant USG propaganda

All in the eye of the beholder. Which was your goal of your ambiguous hand-waving.

Roads and bridges were funded by the US government. Really makes you think, huh?!

[pphysch]

> You don't like it when it's used elsewhere.

Where did I imply that? We agree that PBS is funded by the USG. I provided additional factual context.

> Typical divisive comment to stir the pot.

Pot, meet kettle. Your comment is clearly flame-bait, loaded with strawman fallacies. I will not engage further.

[piqi]

What's your point?