Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ghaff 1211 days ago
Why would they if they haven't already? It's not like Canonical has a lot of money. But, yes, anyone else who Oracle might actually elect to sue won't go anywhere near ZFS.
1 comments

Likely because they want to keep that powder dry until someone with deep pockets gets involved, Microsoft, or IBM or someone.

Because there's a moderate change that it goes against them.

Btrfs has also been improving. Certainly not for all use cases but it's the default for desktop Fedora now and some Synology NASs use it, among others.
On one hand ZFS has held down btrfs because "why bother" when you already have something that does much of what you want, but on the other hand it shows what can be done.

I hope btrfs becomes quite stable and usable.