[bryanrasmussen]

humans all seem to experience making decisions, even the people who claim that there is no free will but that one is an automaton proceeding from some force that one cannot, in the end, identify.

These automaton identifying people however with the ever-elusive force that they cannot identify don't seem any better positioned rhetorically than the free will people, but for some reason they get to claim that free will does not exist just because it cannot be identified with sufficient rigor to match their arguments despite not being able to provide a sufficiently rigorous definition of what happens at the limits where free will breaks down.

If Occam's razor where a thing it seems more sensible just to proceed as if free will actually existed.