|
|
|
|
|
by gabythenerd
1199 days ago
|
|
QA normally do everything manually, with 0 automation I can see some games taking more than 500 testers to go through all possible paths. Especially in live service games like Apex. I worked briefly on a AAA game and my team had 2 dedicated american QAs for the feature that knew everything there was to know and tested happy paths/made docs, and there also was a building of testers in Ukraine that tried to break the game in a myriad of ways and filled general bugs. At some point in alpha we had around 500 bugs filled in jira, and this was only one game mode. |
|
This isn't even possible, I'd be amazed at 25% of paths!