|
|
|
|
|
by Aerroon
1200 days ago
|
|
The people vote in the Parliament. The Parliament decides to build a road. The Parliament appoints Jim to build the road. Is Jim democratically elected? Or does he have some democratic mandate? In most countries this would be corruption. Government projects like that have to go through an open bidding process and even after that Jim would not be considered to have any democratic mandate. The difference between Jim and an EU commissioner is which job he is appointed to. I think in practice the EU commission isn't that bad (so far) - almost all of the people on it are/were big name politicians in their respective countries. I might disagree with a lot of what they have to say, but they did/do represent a sizeable portion of the voters in their country. |
|
No parliament appoints any Jim to build any road in democratic countries.
Jim's company needs to win a regular tender and have to respect a very long list of regulatory and financial requirements.
Jim's company is a supplier, commissioners are regulators.
Much like in my country (and many others in Europe) ministers are appointed by the Prime Minister who is not elected, but appointed by the parliament, by a majority of the votes.
It doesn't make the Prime Minister and all the ministers equal to an average Joe who's been called to fix a squeaking door.